Sunday, June 28, 2020

Funny--You Don't Look Jewish



In an interview on Friday, the head of the Church of England said the west in general needed to question the prevailing mindset that depicted Christ as a white man in traditional Christian imagery.*
Thus, Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury. He went on to say that if you go into churches around the world,
You see a black Jesus, a Chinese Jesus, a Middle-Eastern Jesus – which is of course the most accurate – you see a Fijian Jesus.
Did you notice who was missing from this litany of Jesuses?

That’s right—a Jewish Jesus.

Some of you might claim that “Middle-Eastern Jesus” includes a Jewish Jesus. However, a little effort would winkle the Jews from the Syrians, Egyptians, Iraqis, et al. But, more important, I see the submerging of Jewishness into the general mire of Middle-Easternness as another example of the centuries-old attempt to ahistoricize Christianity’s relationship to Judaism. Consider one other example, cited by Diarmaid MacCulloch in his massive (and brilliant) biography of Thomas Cromwell: In 1535, parish clergy were enlisted
in a campaign of sermons and addresses to get families to teach their children the first building-blocks of the Christian faith—Lord’s Prayer, Apostles’ Creed and Ten Commandments.**
Would that be the same Commandments given to Moses on Mount Sinai for the Jewish people?

To use a very contemporary phrase, aren’t we seeing here examples of cultural/religious appropriation?

*

Anyway, to get back to iconography, I do wonder about the idea that Christians have that any of their portrayals of Jesus—in painting, sculpture, or some other weird  medium***—are really portrayals of the historical personage. Unless I’ve been sleeping at the switch, I have not heard of any itinerant Polaroid photographers snapping pictures of random Nazarenes during the first century. Thus, nobody can claim to know what Jesus looked like. Certainly, the standard portrait has no historical claim to validity; according to Wikipedia, “there is no physical description of Jesus contained in any of the canonical gospels."****

With nothing to contradict us, therefore, I would hope we can all agree on one thing: that he almost certainly looked Jewish.

***


** Thomas Cromwell: A Revolutionary Life

Saturday, June 20, 2020

A Confession


I suppose that some of you dear readers who have been following this blog for a while have come to believe that I, normalvision, am the nicest, sweetest creature to have trod this planet’s turf since the days of Tyrannosaurus rex. But I have to confess that I have moments when I slip down the niceness slope, usually because the good angel sitting on my left shoulder is out-argued by the bad angel on my right. Today is one of those times.

Today is the day scheduled for Donald Trump’s latest lie-fest, to be held in Tulsa, Oklahoma. About 19,000 drinkers of the Kool-Aid will be in attendance. In all probability most of these shoulder-to-shoulder idiots will emulate their duce and not wear a face mask. Why listen to the scientists about the dangers of the coronavirus? 

Why not, instead, create a perfect storm for the pandemic to spread? Even Trump, who understands little, understood enough to have all attendees sign a waiver that neither Trump (Mr. "I am not responsible") nor his campaign will be held responsible for any corona illnesses that will undoubtedly arise from attendance at his love-in.

Now, my good angel is whispering in my ear that one should sympathize with anyone who falls ill (with any malady) and hope, humanely, for their sake that their affliction is mild and soon recovered from.

But my bad angel is spurring me to a feeling of schadenfreude (or, Schadenfreude).* After all, those who catch the virus at the rally will have brought it on themselves, by their own determined ignoring of social distancing and mask wearing. And, unfortunately, after they leave the premises of the arena, many of them will be bringing the virus to other—innocent—contacts. They, therefore, should not be viewed as victims, but as creators of their own (and others') misery, and we should, therefore, like Hamlet feel it’s “sport to have the engineer / Hoist with his own petard.”

***

* Pedantry Note: My personal stylesheet hasn’t yet decided whether to treat the word as an English loanword from German (thus, “schadenfreude”) or as a German word still (thus, “Schadenfreude,” and capitalized as are all German nouns—both common and proper).

Saturday, June 13, 2020

Petition


Petition 


To Donald J. Trump

President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces

Whereas you have recently expressed your opposition to the removal of the names of Confederate generals from military bases, which are, in your words, part of a history of “Winning, Victory, and Freedom,”

And whereas you have expressed your admiration for the same generals, despite their having lost a major war in defense of non-freedom,

And whereas it is admirable to side with those who have opposed and even taken up arms against their own country or turned on their heels when faced with the challenge of having to fight under its flag, as in Viet Nam,

And whereas it is necessary to remember the history of all turncoats, cowards, and traitors, 

Be it hereby resolved that the list of honored traitors to the United States of America, besides those who fought a Civil War against the nation, be augmented by celebratory recognition of Benedict Arnold. 

While Arnold’s actions may be pedantically dismissed by some as having occurred before the United States was established as a nation, we are sure that Attorney General William Barr and his coterie of shysters can find a way to counter that argument and allow the enshrinement of Benedict Arnold to proceed.

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Pop Goes the Weasel


I don’t know how the gods contrived it, but they got it right when they decided that it was my brother who should become the lawyer in the family. They must have searched deeply into my soul and determined that I did not have the requisite character traits to become a member of the bar.

To prove the correctness of what I am saying here, consider my reaction (see below) to a Trumpian event of the day, the news of which has just been posted on line. 
Donald Trump’s Campaign Fires Off Cease-And-Desist Letter To CNN Over Poll That Shows Joe Biden With Wide Lead(1)
That follows what Trump tweeted earlier in the week:
CNN Polls are as Fake as their Reporting(2)
The cease-and-desist letter claimed that the CNN poll was “designed to mislead American voters.” As we all know, anything reported that is negative about Trump is dismissed—without proof—as “fake news.” Thus, a poll that came up with figures showing that Joe Biden is well ahead of the incumbent (at least at this point) could hardly survive a few hours without the typical Trumpian attack. 

Now, since the MO is by now as ancient as the hills, I wouldn’t ordinarily bother wasting my time writing about this latest whine. But—at the same time, Trump has been tweeting about the 75-year-old protester in Buffalo, NY who was assaulted by one of that city’s finest, lay bleeding and ignored in the street, and still lies today in the hospital:
Buffalo protester shoved by Police could be an ANTIFA provocateur. 75 year old Martin Gugino was pushed away after appearing to scan police communications in order to black out the equipment. @OANN  I watched, he fell harder than was pushed. Was aiming scanner. Could be a set up?(3)
“Fake News,” anybody? The master at it again and (this is beyond self-satire) at the same time his flacks call on CNN to take down a First-Amendment-protected report from their news site for being allegedly misleading.

But it gets even better.

Instead of defending the truth of the President’s allegations against Mr. Gugino (which they can’t because there are no facts to support them), Trump’s defenders retreat to the old weasel trick. You know, using words like “could” or “maybe” or the new standard of weaseldom, “only raising (or “asking”) questions.” Here’s what the White House Press Secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, had to say:
The president was raising questions based on a report that he saw, there are questions that need to be asked, and every case we can't jump on one side without looking at all of the facts at play.(4)

*

As I said at the beginning of this post, I don’t have the right character traits to be a lawyer. If I were one for CNN, I would respond to the crazy cease-and-desist letter: “Go soak your head” (and that’s only because I decided to be euphemistic).

But as a non-lawyer who wishes to practice his weaseling skills, I raise a question in the name of fair play:
Is Trump a special specie of fecal matter? 
Only asking.

***




Saturday, June 6, 2020

Tuchus Affen Tisch



If our present situation were the least bit comical, we could exclaim with Oliver Hardy that it’s “another fine mess.” But we are beyond messes; we are in crisis. The murder of George Floyd has brought forward—once again—to the public’s attention the shameful and despicable treatment of Black Americans (and other minorities).

The murder has rallied ordinary people to march for equality and justice, and led more storied names (politicians, corporate leaders, celebrated sports and entertainment figures) to issue statements attacking the systemic racism and inequality of the United States. Corporations, sports leagues and teams, newspapers and other media have joined in the chorus. The sincerity factor of these statements ranges from whole-hearted to public relations boilerplate.

*
When the crowds go home, politicians will resume their defensive crouch. They will call for reform—never again!—and form commissions. Some of these commissions may even be “blue ribbon.” These commissions will issue reports and the politicians will claim to have done something. But another commission won’t tell us anything we don’t already know.
          Adam Harris, The Atlantic*
Better housing, fairer lending practices, more employment opportunities, greater education resources—these are a few of the issues that have been advocated by protesting groups. I would wish that politicians would speedily enact measures to bring about the desired outcomes. However, to test the sincerity of politicians I will focus on only two issues.

*
“No taxation without representation!” 

That rallying cry by the colonists gets right to the basic principle of democracy. The right to be represented in the decision making of one’s country. And to be represented one must have access to the ballot box. 

For years now, however, the Republican Party has systematically worked to deprive citizens of this country of the opportunity to vote for those who will govern. The GOP has attempted to use citizenship tests, culling of the voter rolls, ID demands, intimidating poll watchers, gerrymandering, reduced early voting—among other ploys—to keep voters, especially Black Americans and other minorities for exercising their right of the suffrage. (Here are some Google entries about this.**)

So, I call upon Republican politicos,*** if, having witnessed the events of the previous week or so, they are serious about making the country a better, fairer, more just nation, to cease their efforts to deprive their fellow Americans of their most basic right—the right to decide on their representation, and to support legislation to ensure unfettered access to the ballot box.

*
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”
Juvenal

Juvenal’s words point to a basic problem for all societies. You have your guardians, who are deputed to keep the society safe. But who will watch over those same guardians to make sure that they do not do things to undermine the society? 

We trust our police forces to make sure that their watchfulness keeps us safe. But as we have seen, that trust is misplaced, because our custodes are serial breakers of the laws that they are sworn to uphold. And Black Americans and other minorities have been the major victims of the corrupted custodes.

So, my second demand is that all the sweet-talking politicians of both parties support (at all governmental levels in our federal system) laws that will bring into effect civilian review boards—with real teeth—custodire ipsos custodes

*

“[F]rothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. I am from Missouri. You have got to show me.”
Willard Duncan Vandiver 

It is time that we too neither be convinced nor satisfied by frothy statements of solidarity and support at this time of crisis. It is time for those pronouncers of glorious words show us. 

It’s tuchus affen tisch time everybody!

***




May 18, 2020 - Voter suppression is at the very heart of Republican electoral ... “Voters deemed suspicious” by the GOP is a category that includes black ...


Dec 21, 2019 - 'Traditionally, it's always been Republicans suppressing votes'; Adviser ... to false accusations that the GOP engages in voter suppression.


The court held that the GOP used the data they gathered to remove the first week of early voting because more African American voters voted during that week, ...


Apr 8, 2020 - Far too many Republicans seem to have decided that the deadly coronavirus for which there is no vaccine can be used to suppress voter ...


Oct 23, 2018 - You're seeing a national effort by the Republican Party to try to restrict voting rights, and it's playing out in states all across the country. Ari Berman ...


Dec 21, 2019 - In leaked audio, a top Trump adviser said the Republican party has 'traditionally' relied on voter suppression. Kat Tenbarge. 2019-12-21T17:42: ...


Apr 5, 2020 - Perhaps 10 years of relentless voter suppression have now left the Republican Party ill-equipped to reckon with the pandemic's looming threat ...

*** Excluding, of course, the conspiracy theorists and pile-the-army-on-the-streets theorists like Tom Cotton).

Monday, June 1, 2020

The Relevance of the Irrelevant (Take 2)


Last November I printed a blog post entitled “The Relevance of the Irrelevant.”* The main point of the post was that when someone introduces something into an argument or discussion that is off-topic, they are inadvertently revealing what is truly in their mind. 

That latest example of this comes to us from the state of Mississippi. The mayor of a town called Petal, Hal Marx, commenting on the death of George Floyd, contended that he “didn’t see anything unreasonable” about it. Apparently, pressing one’s knee on a man’s neck for almost nine minutes while one’s victim cries out that he can’t breathe is quite reasonable down south. Marx added that “if you can say you can’t breathe, you’re breathing.”** 

What we have here is an example of pedantry used as an attempt to segue into an irrelevant tangent. Yes, Mayor Marx is pedantically correct in that if you can speak, you’re alive and breathing. Except, of course, every English speaker understands the words “I can’t breathe” are not to be taken literally. They are a signal that something dangerous is happening. 

Why did the mayor go off on a tangent? The irrelevance tells us the truth about his mindset as proven by his subsequent words: “Most likely that man died of overdose or heart attack.” “That man,” George Floyd, a Black American, had to be a contributor to his own demise. He couldn’t just be a victim of (white) police brutality; he had to be a criminal of some sort—at the very least a druggie. 

If Hal Marx had not offered up the irrelevant pedantry, would we know him as a racist?

I wonder what Marx would say to Mr. Shakespeare, whose Hamlet says (in Act V, Scene 2) after he has been pricked by a poisoned rapier: “I am dead, Horatio.”   

***