T'ain't funny, McGee!

In 2009, I wrote a post entitled “De Mortuis . . .,” (1) which was inspired by the death of a conservative columnist whom I refused to even name. One of his claims to fame—such as it was—was the coining of mindless alliterative quips for the later-disgraced Spiro Agnew. 

Another celebrated Republican quipster—at least celebrated amongst that tribe as a latter-day Oscar Wilde—was Saint Ronald Reagan. His most famous mot, still lovingly repeated by his acolytes, is: “The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.” I always wondered if anybody with half a brain would accept the opposite statement: “I’m from the government, but I don’t give a damn.” 

Well, this week we learned of one Republican—obviously without half a brain—Mayor Tim Boyd of Colorado City, Texas, who believes that the role of government in a time of crisis is to do nothing except to espouse a brand of Social Darwinism. (2)

*

About half a century ago during an energy crisis, bumper stickers in petroleum-rich Texas read, “Let New England freeze in the dark.” Today, Yankees of the nicer sort are not affixing “Let Texas freeze in the dark” stickers on their vehicles.

*

To return to the swampland of conservative quipsters, are you willing to say nothing but good about Rush Limbaugh, the loud-mouthed racist and misogynist who kicked off the other day? De mortuis be damned! He was another of those personages who passed for wits among the right-wing tribe. But as Conor  Friedersdorf of The Atlantic notes, “[N]o Limbaugh quote stands out as especially witty or brilliant.” (3)

Perhaps Limbaugh’s most famous coinage was “feminazi,” which is a locution that really gets up my gourd. Whatever distaste one might have with feminists (I don’t have any) the attempt to equate what they are about with the murderers of the Third Reich is beyond disgusting. Some early feminists might have burned a bra or two, but they did not gas millions of Jews or start a horrific world war. Limbaugh was worse than a Holocaust denier; he was a Holocaust trivializer. The ashes of Auschwitz served only to soil the proponents of equal rights.

Friedersdorf ends his article on Limbaugh saying, “May he rest in peace.”

Conor is a much nicer person than me. I say, “May he rot in hell!”

***

(1)   https://drnormalvision.blogspot.com/2009/10/de-mortuis_09.html

(2)   https://news.yahoo.com/texas-mayor-says-government-utility-001034037.html

Thankfully for the residents of Colorado City, Boyd has since resigned.

(3)   https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/02/rush-limbaughs-rise-and-conservatisms-fall/618058/

 

Dead Certainties

There was only one small table, with no chairs, wedged in between one side of the double door, the edge of the wall, and a large photograph of Bartali.
Carlo Lucarelli, Via Delle Oche
(Trans. Michael Reynolds)

***

Two weeks ago, Vincenzo Nibali became the first Italian cyclist to win the Tour de France since 1998.
And one week before that victory, another Italian Tour winner was honored in Tuscany on the centennial anniversary of his birth. Gino Bartali won the great event twice—once before World War Two, in 1938, and once after, in 1948. However, as Lizzie Davies explains in the Guardian (UK), Bartali's greatest feats came away from the race course:

In the aftermath of September 1943, when Italy had surrendered to Allied forces and swaths of northern and central Italy became Mussolini's Nazi puppet republic, [Bartali] is understood to have transported counterfeit identity papers to Jews who were at risk of being deported to concentration camps. The papers were hidden in the frame of his bike.*

He also hid Jews in the cellar of his house. For his actions Bartali was posthumously recognized as being one of the Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem, the Holocaust memorial center in Jerusalem.
How many people could honestly say that they would have acted as bravely as Bartali in similar circumstances? Well, we know that every Frenchman today would swear on his last baguette that in the 1940s he would have joined the Resistance. But as for the rest of us . . .?

*

I hate hypothetical questions. I have no idea whether I would divert a runaway train to run over 950 senior citizens instead of a new-born baby. I figure I'll deal with that issue when it arises. So, if I have no idea how I would act in advance of a situation, I certainly wouldn't presume to proclaim that I have privileged knowledge of how other people (whether living or dead) would act. But the more I read, the more I feel that I am in the minority, for the world seems full of self-confident mindreaders.
Take Elton John (Please!--sorry, I had to channel my inner Henny Youngman). Sir Elton, according to the British press, is certain that Jesus would have backed gay marriage:

If Jesus Christ was alive today, I cannot see him, as the Christian person that he was and the great person that he was, saying this could not happen.
The Independent

Andrew Brown, who writes about religion for the Guardian, points out that Sir Elton's statement is

a bit like saying that Plato would have been a heavy user of Facebook. We can't prove otherwise, but it's more a remark about gay marriage, than the historical figure.

Elton John has form here. Like many celebrities, he seems to understand Jesus as a distinguished member of his entourage, one for whom he will always make VIP tickets available, and who agrees with him about everything important.

The need to have the exclusive sanction for one's necrophiliac reading of Jesus' mind is apparently so great that people will even resort to the law courts to secure it for themselves:

Tyler Perry has won a long trademark battle for What Would Jesus Do, defeating a reality television series star who sought to use the trademark for a Christian reality show.
Kim “Poprah” Kearney, who acquired some fame after appearing on VH1’s reality series I Want to Work for Diddy, filed a trademark to use What Would Jesus Do for a Christian reality show in January 2008.
Tyler Perry Studios filed an entertainment services trademark for What Would Jesus Do in May of that year, in an attempt to secure the rights to use the phrase for entertainment products including films, musicals and television series.
The Guardian

And it will probably come as no surprise that a recent poll showed that Democratic voters asserted that Jesus would align himself with their side on the contentious political issues of the day, while Republicans claimed that the Nazarene would be voting with them.**

Now, please don't get me wrong, I'm not just picking on the “What-Would-Jesus-Do”ers here. The “What Would”s are all over the place. “What would the Founding Fathers have thought about our libertarian crazies?” asks a headline on Salon.com. The Atlantic poses a foreign policy question:

What Would Reagan Do in Iraq?

Rand Paul and Rick Perry each claim to be the Gipper’s heir in the Middle East. Who's right?

*

Well, to all this mindreading, I say “Feh!” I have no idea how Marx (whether Karl or Groucho) would have organized the Brazilian defense at the last World Cup or what Machiavelli would have done to secure an Oscar (either the midfielder or the statue). I barely have a glimmer of an idea of what I might have for breakfast tomorrow.

But I must admit that there is one hypothetical question that I am willing to deal with:

You are the propelling your small raft toward the survivors of a shipwreck. There are four drowning men in the water—a disc jockey, a used-car salesman, a leper, and Rush Limbaugh. You have room to save only three of them. Who would you leave to the sharks?

Now, that's a no-brainer!

***

*http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/17/italy-remembers-gino-bartali-cycling-hero-save-jews-nazis
**http://www.salon.com/2014/07/14/republicans_confuse_atlas_shrugged_for_the_bible_partner/