Showing posts with label Stalin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stalin. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2022

Benito never kicked my cat

Tucker Carlson:

Has Putin ever called me a racist? Has he threatened to get me fired for disagreeing with him? Has he shipped every middle-class job in my town to Russia? Did he manufacture a worldwide pandemic that wrecked my business and kept me indoors for two years? Is he teaching my children to embrace racial discrimination? Is he making fentanyl? Is he trying to snuff out Christianity? Does he eat dogs?

These are fair questions, and the answer to all of them is "no." Vladimir Putin didn't do any of that. So, why does permanent Washington hate him so much?


https://www.mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson/tucker-carlson-gives-passionate-defense-vladimir-putin-person


*


Benito never kicked my cat,

Ate my porridge, crushed my hat.


Stalin remembered to return

My samovar, my coffee urn.


Hitler and the Nazi SS

Never made my carpet a mess.


I confess that Pol Pot

Never took my parking spot.


Pinochet and Vlad the Impaler

Never squatted in my house trailer.


The Tonton Macoute and Papa Doc

Never re-set my electric clock.


And surely Chairman Mao

Never tried to milk my cow.


Franco warned the Falange:

“Hands off Tucker’s blancmange.”


Thus I am so very glad 

To deny that they were bad.


 

Friday, September 13, 2019

Comrade Stalin Is Never Wrong

The other day I stumbled upon a wonderful short, short story by Robin Jones entitled “Where is Pyotr Zhukov?”(1) In the Soviet gulag, a sharp-thinking criminal takes on the identity of a recently-deceased fellow prisoner. As it turns out, the dead man was a violinist—“a fine violinist,” declared as such by Stalin himself.

Soon the presumed violinist is released from the prison camp and transported to Moscow to “serve Russia, and to play before the leader himself.” Only one problem, the fake Zhukov can’t play a note.
On opening night, Vanya dresses in elegant black and goes to the stage and waits in the wing.  Comrades! Welcome the dear leader’s most favoured violinist – the finest west of the Urals – Pyotr Zhukov!  
Caught in the spotlight, there is only one thing to do—take the bow and scrape it across the strings.
And so, he begins to slice and stab with the bow. He cuts at the violin as if it were a weak inmate protecting a ration. He scratches and rips until the violin screams into the stalls. He tortures the violin not into notes but into shrieks and fury.  
When he finally stops his frightening attack on the instrument, what can the horrified audience do?
[T]hey were told this man was favoured by Stalin. And Stalin is here in attendance. And Stalin is never wrong. So what can the audience do? No applause for Zhukov is no applause for Stalin.
And so they applaud. They weep and stand and applaud. And the murderer hears the applause as though it were for a true Pyotr Zhukov. And no one in the audience dares stop.  . . . [A] triumph of beauty is declared and the triumph is Stalin’s who recognised Zhukov as the finest west of the Urals. A new Soviet music is born and all are blessed that hear it.
I will leave you now to read the rest of the story.

*

After 85 years, it was time for an update of Frank Perkins and Mitchell Parish’s classic ballad “Stars Fell on Alabama.” 

“A Hurricane Will Fall on Alabama” doesn’t quite scan, but President Trump proclaimed it—and comrade leader is never wrong. And soon the presidential truth machine went to work to quash any dissent. 
President Trump, seeking to justify his claim of a hurricane threat to Alabama, pressed aides to intervene with a federal scientific agency, leading to a highly unusual public rebuke of the forecasters who contradicted him, according to people familiar with the events.
In response to the president’s request, Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, told Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary, to have the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration publicly correct the forecasters, who had insisted that Alabama was not actually at risk from Hurricane Dorian.(2)
And Ross hopped to it. calling
Neil Jacobs, the acting administrator of NOAA, at home around 3 a.m. Friday, Washington time, and instructed him to clear up the agency’s contradiction of the president.
Then Wilbur (I-Am-Vying-For-Chief-Grifter) Ross went even further, displaying an admirably-dictatorial fist:
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross reportedly threatened to fire some of the nation’s weather officials if they refused to lie to the public about the projected path of Hurricane Dorian.(3)
It’s a rule of this administration that everyone must fall in line. After all, comrade leader is never wrong.

And the dissenters can consider themselves lucky. In another time and place, they’d be on a transport to the gulag.

***









Thursday, September 10, 2009

Geese and Ganders

Three Analogies

***
Analogy One:

From Plato’s Apology

(Translated by Benjamin Jowett)


Socrates questions one of his accusers.

Come hither, Meletus, and let me ask a question of you. You think a great deal about the improvement of youth?

Yes, I do.

Tell the judges, then, who is their improver; for you must know, as you have taken the pains to discover their corrupter, and are citing and accusing me before them. Speak, then, and tell the judges who their improver is….

The judges, Socrates, who are present in court.

What do you mean to say, Meletus, that they are able to instruct and improve youth?

Certainly they are.

What, all of them, or some only and not others?

All of them.

By the goddess Here, that is good news! There are plenty of improvers, then. And what do you say of the audience, - do they improve them?

Yes, they do.

And the senators?

Yes, the senators improve them.

But perhaps the members of the citizen assembly corrupt them? - or do they too improve them?

They improve them.

Then every Athenian improves and elevates them; all with the exception of myself; and I alone am their corrupter? Is that what you affirm?

That is what I stoutly affirm.

I am very unfortunate if that is true. But suppose I ask you a question: Would you say that this also holds true in the case of horses? Does one man do them harm and all the world good? Is not the exact opposite of this true? One man is able to do them good, or at least not many; - the trainer of horses, that is to say, does them good, and others who have to do with them rather injure them?

And so Socrates rebuts the charge that he alone of all Athenians is a corrupter of youth. Or does he? His defense rests on an analogy: The training of youth is like the training of horses. Are you willing to buy that analogy? Socrates puts forward the analogy but offers no proof that the analogy is sound. The question “Does a human being need only one teacher?” (for having many will corrupt him) is never examined.

***

Analogy Two:

The statement “You can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs” is most famously attributed to Josef Stalin (although apparently it did not originate with him).

Stalin used that analogy to claim that desired political results necessitated harsh measures. (Basically, “the ends justify the means” defense.) Can the loss of millions of lives be exculpated by the omelets made from the eggs laid by the hens on collectivized farms?

***

Analogy Three:

A half century ago, in the long shadow of the McCarthy era, the student government of my college (the City College of New York) defiantly held an Academic Freedom Week each year. I was co-chair of the event one year, although I must confess that my partner did most of the work. And she it was who was able to snare Ayn Rand for an appearance during the event. Now, Rand was too grand to lower herself to debate anyone, but she did deign to “share” the platform with another speaker, in this case a member of the New York University law faculty, Robert B. McKay*.

In her presentation Rand sneered at the concept of academic freedom and asserted that a professor who upset the university powers-that-be should be sacked as easily and rightfully as a worker in a shoe factory who crossed the business’ owner. When it was his turn to speak, McKay riposted: “The soul of a man is different from the sole of a shoe.”

***

In his book The Duck That Won the Lottery, Julian Baggini states: “Arguments from analogy can be rhetorically powerful, but it is vital that we question whether the parallels are close enough to justify the conclusions drawn from them.” An analogy is not a proof; I prefer to think of it as a suggestion (“Look at example A as if were case B”). And analogies must be examined to see if, as Baggini points out, “the content of the arguments is analogous, [and] not just the forms.”

In conclusion: are human beings analogous to horses, eggs, or shoes?

***

*McKay’s obituary from the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/14/obituaries/robert-mckay-70-legal-scholar-who-led-1971-attica-panel-dies.html?scp=1&sq=Robert%20McKay&st=cse