Showing posts with label Euphemism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Euphemism. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Language Follies 16

Quotes of the Day



Every jest is an earnest in the womb of Time.


(George Bernard Shaw, John Bull’s Other Island)


#


It’s very easy to have a simple theory, if it is completely false.


(Daniel Kahneman)


*


How to Get Clean (Warily)


There’s “Naval Diplomacy”




Or  


“Krakengard”




*


Euphemism Watch


From The New Yorker (1965)




*


We Don’t Mean It When We Say It


Restaurant patrons who order chicken wings marketed as "boneless" can't expect them to actually be boneless, according to a Thursday ruling from the Ohio Supreme Court. . . .

[I]n Thursday's 4-3 ruling, the Ohio Supreme Court said "boneless" wings refers to a cooking style, and that Berkheimer should have been on guard against bones since it's common knowledge that chickens have bones. The high court sided with lower courts that had dismissed Berkheimer's suit.

"A diner reading 'boneless wings' on a menu would no more believe that the restaurant was warranting the absence of bones in the items than believe that the items were made from chicken wings, just as a person eating 'chicken fingers' would know that he had not been served fingers," wrote Justice Joseph T. Deters for the majority.*

*

Family Circle magazine contributed this wake-up call advertisement to The New Yorker issue of October 30, 1965:










As of today, almost 60 years later, I have read only about 15 of those books. I guess they shouldn’t have let me in to college.




***


https://www.yahoo.com/news/chicken-wings-sold-boneless-bones-221548080.html


 

Friday, March 15, 2024

Language Follies 11 (The Ides of March Edition)

The Ides of March


If you’re Julius Caesar, you should take the soothsayer’s advice and beware this day. If you’re anybody else, there’s nothing to fear. “Ides,” which sounds so ominous, did not mean anything like”hex” or “evil eye.” In Roman times it merely was the designation for the middle of the month; hence, for March, the 15th.


*


Today’s Orwell Award for Euphemism


“Pain compliance


“In a nutshell, pain compliance involves either manipulating a person's joints or activating certain pressure points to create sufficient pain to achieve compliance.”*


Don’t you love police talk?


*


The Wisdom of the Walls


Here’s some of the latest intelligence from the boundaries of sporting venues:


“100% Guaranteed Gasolines” 


(As distinct, one wonders, from what?)


<>


“Defending Networks. Hunting Forwards”


<>


“Tawandang German Brewery” 


(Which is located at 462/61 Rama III Rd, Chong Nonsi, Yan Nawa, Bangkok 10120, Thailand)


<>


And, finally Dr. Cinik, the good old Turkish man-of-all-work, who offers “Dental Treatments,” “Hair Transplants,” “Plastic Surgery.”



*


“Psyop”


(Or, “I am talking out of my rear end”)


“Lately,” The Washington Post, tells us,


it’s become popular in conservative media circles to brand certain things as a psychological operation, or “psyop.”

Climate change, for example. Or covid. Or the media coverage of Donald Trump. Or even the prosecution of Hunter Biden.


The Post identifies Fox News host Jesse Watters as 


perhaps the most influential superspreader of the term. In January, Watters used a just-asking-questions formula to suggest that Taylor Swift is a psyop asset of the Defense Department. 


Watters acknowledged that his show “obviously has no evidence” for the claim . . .**


*


“If I Wasn’t So Wrong, I’d Be Right”


Winthrop Sargeant was classical music reviewer of The New Yorker for many years. This item from April 30,1955 beats anything else he ever wrote:




*


And lest you think that a non-music music review would top the crazy chart in 1955, here’s a conspiracy theory that belongs to the world of Jesse Watters 


***

* https://www.officer.com/home/article/10250067/pain-compliance-vs-body-mechanics

** https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/media/2024/02/22/psyop-conspiracy-theory-conservative-media/




Wednesday, February 22, 2023

Language Follies 3

We start off today with a major award: the George Orwell Euphemism Prize.


It goes to the university where I spent a third of the 20th century teaching: New Jersey City University.


Although I’m sure that cause-and-effect is not at play here, the fact remains that in the two decades since I retired, the school has plunged into massive debt (even taking into account that my monstrous salary was taken off the books). So, the school has announced that action will be taken to stabilize the ship: it will be “rightsizing.” 


That is, NJCU will be firing staff. 


And what can be wrong when you are doing “right”?



Now for some food shopping.


Can you imagine a more delicious way to expire than to munch some Tombstone Pizza?



Want some deli? Super Fresh supermarket offers this MOTO (Master of the Obvious) aviso in its weekly circular:



*


Are you “everybody”? Don’t you just love those ads that claim that “everybody” is buying this or that? Here’s a variation:


The Canned Tuna Every Family Is Switching To


Now, if ever I was blessed (or is it cursed?) to be a member of the management team for the advancement of this particular brand of canned tuna, I would raise my hand at the next meeting and venture to suggest that the company could save money by not advertising the product. After all, if “Every Family” is switching to our fish, all we’d have to do is wait and we’d have the market to ourselves without the need to spend even a dime more. History is on our side! 


*


What’s in your mailbox? Mine is filled six days a week with appeals from charitable organizations for some of my hoard of gelt. What most of the envelopes contain is something like this:




An offer for a “free gift.” Which qualifies as this post’s Tautology Award.


Aren't gifts by definition “free”? Would you spring for an "unfree gift"?


Anyway, I am a sucker for good deeds and have responded with a check to many of the appeals: environmental, medical, humanitarian. And as a result, I have accumulated a load of “free gifts.”



                                                            
                                             Don't forget the hats!


Amazing, though, how many hundreds of dollars these “free gifts” have cost me.

 

Monday, April 25, 2022

By The Numbers

About six weeks ago I published a blog post that cited George Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language,” which discusses the nefarious use of euphemism to cover up war atrocities (https://drnormalvision.blogspot.com/2022/03/special-cover-up.html). I wrote:

Putin’s war against Ukraine can serve as an object lesson in euphemism. For one thing, the word “war” has been outlawed in Russia; Putin has called his invasion a “special operation.” What can be vaguer than something called “an operation”? What exactly goes on in “an operation”? . . .

Meanwhile, shells are landing on civilian targets, millions are fleeing their homes, or hiding out in improvised shelters—and the death toll mounts.

In the latest issue of The Atlantic Anne Applebaum has an essay entitled “UKRAINE AND THE WORDS THAT LEAD TO MASS MURDER: First comes the dehumanization. Then comes the killing” (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/06/ukraine-mass-murder-hate-speech-soviet/629629/). The essay enlarges upon the point I made in my blog, going into great detail on the history of Russian denigration of Ukraine and Ukrainians and the genocidal results therefrom. As Applebaum points out, “[W]hile not every use of genocidal hate speech leads to genocide, all genocides have been preceded by genocidal hate speech.”


I recommend reading her essay.


*


I am sure that the following news will make you all breathe easier:

Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill Monday to create a police force dedicated to pursuing voter fraud and other election crimes.*

The Guardian notes, however, 

Voter fraud is rare, typically occurs in isolated instances and is generally detected. An Associated Press investigation of the 2020 presidential election found fewer than 475 potential cases of voter fraud out of 25.5 million ballots cast in the six states where Trump and his allies disputed his loss to President Joe Biden.

Despite the fact that there are few cases of voter fraud, here are two cases that made the news. First, in Florida itself:

Two men from The Villages—a Florida retirement community known for its staunch support of former President Donald Trump—have pleaded guilty to voting more than once during the 2020 election.** 


Second:

Mark Meadows—a former chief of staff to President Donald Trump who was removed from North Carolina voter rolls earlier this month—is still a registered voter in two other states, according to officials and a published report.***


I can’t wait until DeSantis’ posse begins rounding up all those Republican election cheaters.


*


While we’re stuck in the swamp of Florida, let me clue you in on why the state has banned 54 math books. It’s looking to find one that claims that 74,216,154 votes are greater than 81,268,924. That’s Republican arithmetic.


***

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/25/ron-desantis-florida-governor-bill-police-voter-fraud

** https://www.businessinsider.com/2-men-pro-trump-florida-the-villages-admit-voter-fraud-2022-4?inline-endstory-related-recommendations=

*** https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2022-04-22/mark-meadows-also-registered-to-vote-in-south-carolina

Tuesday, March 8, 2022

Special Cover-up

George Orwell’s most famous essay is “Politics and the English Language,” written in 1946.* He wrote out of concern that “the present political chaos is connected with the decay of language” and in hope that “one can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal end.”

In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible. . . . Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. Defenceless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets: this is called pacification. Millions of peasants are robbed of their farms and sent trudging along the roads with no more than they can carry: this is called transfer of population or rectification of frontiers. People are imprisoned for years without trial, or shot in the back of the neck or sent to die of scurvy in Arctic lumber camps: this is called elimination of unreliable elements

The workings of euphemism are wonderful: “pacification” has the root meaning “making peaceful”; “rectification” has the root meaning “making right.” Who can oppose such claims? And surely “elimination” of the “unreliable” has to be beneficial.


Euphemism is from a Greek word meaning "good speech.” The substitution of nice terms to cover up nasty deeds (as exemplified above) is one way to accomplish that mind trickery. Another way is the use of very general and/or abstract words to deflect audience’s attention from the dirty specifics.** 


Putin’s war against Ukraine can serve as an object lesson in euphemism. For one thing, the word “war” has been outlawed in Russia; Putin has called his invasion a “special operation.” What can be vaguer than something called “an operation”? What exactly goes on in “an operation”? The use of the term when applied to a surgical practice (probably the most used application of the term), although describing an action that is designed to have a beneficial outcome, is still a cover-up of the nasty work of cutting into a patient’s body. Beyond medicine, the vagueness of “operation” can denote any kind of action: the “operation” of a motor vehicle, for example. 


And the modifier “special”: the “operation” is not indiscriminate or ordinary, but purposely focused, like a “special” gift for a “special” person.


Meanwhile, shells are landing on civilian targets, millions are fleeing their homes, or hiding out in improvised shelters—and the death toll mounts.


*


Vladimir Putin, the ex-KGB man, may be an expert in spycraft, but he is no historian. His arguments about the relationship of Russia and Ukraine (and Russians and Ukrainians) is fraught with error. In a speech in February, Putin asserted that 

Ukraine and Russia are, in historical terms, essentially inseparable.

“Ukraine is not just a neighboring country for us. It is an inalienable part of our own history, culture and spiritual space,” he said. . . . “Since time immemorial, the people living in the south-west of what has historically been Russian land have called themselves Russians.”***

Ok, let’s for the moment forget that what Putin said is not historically correct. Let’s instead consider that that is what Putin sincerely believes. Which is the real interesting thing. If Putin can unleash a war against a populace he believes to be his own people—that is native Russians—what carnage and destruction would he unleash against the natives of Ukraine if he believed that they were really Ukrainians?


***


https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/politics-and-the-english-language/

** Consider here these two examples of Nazi euphemism:

“As part of the final solution…Jews fit for work” would be separated by sex and forced to do road construction, “in the course of which the majority will doubtless succumb to natural wastage.”


Dear Party Comrade Rademacher! On my return trip from Berlin I met an old party comrade, who works in the east on the settlement of the Jewish question. In the near future many of the Jewish vermin will be exterminated through special measures.


https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2022/03/24/wannsee-the-road-to-the-final-solution-peter-longerich/


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

End Note:

"The war is framed in Russia in terms of forcing peace upon Ukraine."

Masha Gessen

The New Yorker