Saturday, June 13, 2020

Petition


Petition 


To Donald J. Trump

President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces

Whereas you have recently expressed your opposition to the removal of the names of Confederate generals from military bases, which are, in your words, part of a history of “Winning, Victory, and Freedom,”

And whereas you have expressed your admiration for the same generals, despite their having lost a major war in defense of non-freedom,

And whereas it is admirable to side with those who have opposed and even taken up arms against their own country or turned on their heels when faced with the challenge of having to fight under its flag, as in Viet Nam,

And whereas it is necessary to remember the history of all turncoats, cowards, and traitors, 

Be it hereby resolved that the list of honored traitors to the United States of America, besides those who fought a Civil War against the nation, be augmented by celebratory recognition of Benedict Arnold. 

While Arnold’s actions may be pedantically dismissed by some as having occurred before the United States was established as a nation, we are sure that Attorney General William Barr and his coterie of shysters can find a way to counter that argument and allow the enshrinement of Benedict Arnold to proceed.

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Pop Goes the Weasel


I don’t know how the gods contrived it, but they got it right when they decided that it was my brother who should become the lawyer in the family. They must have searched deeply into my soul and determined that I did not have the requisite character traits to become a member of the bar.

To prove the correctness of what I am saying here, consider my reaction (see below) to a Trumpian event of the day, the news of which has just been posted on line. 
Donald Trump’s Campaign Fires Off Cease-And-Desist Letter To CNN Over Poll That Shows Joe Biden With Wide Lead(1)
That follows what Trump tweeted earlier in the week:
CNN Polls are as Fake as their Reporting(2)
The cease-and-desist letter claimed that the CNN poll was “designed to mislead American voters.” As we all know, anything reported that is negative about Trump is dismissed—without proof—as “fake news.” Thus, a poll that came up with figures showing that Joe Biden is well ahead of the incumbent (at least at this point) could hardly survive a few hours without the typical Trumpian attack. 

Now, since the MO is by now as ancient as the hills, I wouldn’t ordinarily bother wasting my time writing about this latest whine. But—at the same time, Trump has been tweeting about the 75-year-old protester in Buffalo, NY who was assaulted by one of that city’s finest, lay bleeding and ignored in the street, and still lies today in the hospital:
Buffalo protester shoved by Police could be an ANTIFA provocateur. 75 year old Martin Gugino was pushed away after appearing to scan police communications in order to black out the equipment. @OANN  I watched, he fell harder than was pushed. Was aiming scanner. Could be a set up?(3)
“Fake News,” anybody? The master at it again and (this is beyond self-satire) at the same time his flacks call on CNN to take down a First-Amendment-protected report from their news site for being allegedly misleading.

But it gets even better.

Instead of defending the truth of the President’s allegations against Mr. Gugino (which they can’t because there are no facts to support them), Trump’s defenders retreat to the old weasel trick. You know, using words like “could” or “maybe” or the new standard of weaseldom, “only raising (or “asking”) questions.” Here’s what the White House Press Secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, had to say:
The president was raising questions based on a report that he saw, there are questions that need to be asked, and every case we can't jump on one side without looking at all of the facts at play.(4)

*

As I said at the beginning of this post, I don’t have the right character traits to be a lawyer. If I were one for CNN, I would respond to the crazy cease-and-desist letter: “Go soak your head” (and that’s only because I decided to be euphemistic).

But as a non-lawyer who wishes to practice his weaseling skills, I raise a question in the name of fair play:
Is Trump a special specie of fecal matter? 
Only asking.

***




Saturday, June 6, 2020

Tuchus Affen Tisch



If our present situation were the least bit comical, we could exclaim with Oliver Hardy that it’s “another fine mess.” But we are beyond messes; we are in crisis. The murder of George Floyd has brought forward—once again—to the public’s attention the shameful and despicable treatment of Black Americans (and other minorities).

The murder has rallied ordinary people to march for equality and justice, and led more storied names (politicians, corporate leaders, celebrated sports and entertainment figures) to issue statements attacking the systemic racism and inequality of the United States. Corporations, sports leagues and teams, newspapers and other media have joined in the chorus. The sincerity factor of these statements ranges from whole-hearted to public relations boilerplate.

*
When the crowds go home, politicians will resume their defensive crouch. They will call for reform—never again!—and form commissions. Some of these commissions may even be “blue ribbon.” These commissions will issue reports and the politicians will claim to have done something. But another commission won’t tell us anything we don’t already know.
          Adam Harris, The Atlantic*
Better housing, fairer lending practices, more employment opportunities, greater education resources—these are a few of the issues that have been advocated by protesting groups. I would wish that politicians would speedily enact measures to bring about the desired outcomes. However, to test the sincerity of politicians I will focus on only two issues.

*
“No taxation without representation!” 

That rallying cry by the colonists gets right to the basic principle of democracy. The right to be represented in the decision making of one’s country. And to be represented one must have access to the ballot box. 

For years now, however, the Republican Party has systematically worked to deprive citizens of this country of the opportunity to vote for those who will govern. The GOP has attempted to use citizenship tests, culling of the voter rolls, ID demands, intimidating poll watchers, gerrymandering, reduced early voting—among other ploys—to keep voters, especially Black Americans and other minorities for exercising their right of the suffrage. (Here are some Google entries about this.**)

So, I call upon Republican politicos,*** if, having witnessed the events of the previous week or so, they are serious about making the country a better, fairer, more just nation, to cease their efforts to deprive their fellow Americans of their most basic right—the right to decide on their representation, and to support legislation to ensure unfettered access to the ballot box.

*
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”
Juvenal

Juvenal’s words point to a basic problem for all societies. You have your guardians, who are deputed to keep the society safe. But who will watch over those same guardians to make sure that they do not do things to undermine the society? 

We trust our police forces to make sure that their watchfulness keeps us safe. But as we have seen, that trust is misplaced, because our custodes are serial breakers of the laws that they are sworn to uphold. And Black Americans and other minorities have been the major victims of the corrupted custodes.

So, my second demand is that all the sweet-talking politicians of both parties support (at all governmental levels in our federal system) laws that will bring into effect civilian review boards—with real teeth—custodire ipsos custodes

*

“[F]rothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. I am from Missouri. You have got to show me.”
Willard Duncan Vandiver 

It is time that we too neither be convinced nor satisfied by frothy statements of solidarity and support at this time of crisis. It is time for those pronouncers of glorious words show us. 

It’s tuchus affen tisch time everybody!

***




May 18, 2020 - Voter suppression is at the very heart of Republican electoral ... “Voters deemed suspicious” by the GOP is a category that includes black ...


Dec 21, 2019 - 'Traditionally, it's always been Republicans suppressing votes'; Adviser ... to false accusations that the GOP engages in voter suppression.


The court held that the GOP used the data they gathered to remove the first week of early voting because more African American voters voted during that week, ...


Apr 8, 2020 - Far too many Republicans seem to have decided that the deadly coronavirus for which there is no vaccine can be used to suppress voter ...


Oct 23, 2018 - You're seeing a national effort by the Republican Party to try to restrict voting rights, and it's playing out in states all across the country. Ari Berman ...


Dec 21, 2019 - In leaked audio, a top Trump adviser said the Republican party has 'traditionally' relied on voter suppression. Kat Tenbarge. 2019-12-21T17:42: ...


Apr 5, 2020 - Perhaps 10 years of relentless voter suppression have now left the Republican Party ill-equipped to reckon with the pandemic's looming threat ...

*** Excluding, of course, the conspiracy theorists and pile-the-army-on-the-streets theorists like Tom Cotton).

Monday, June 1, 2020

The Relevance of the Irrelevant (Take 2)


Last November I printed a blog post entitled “The Relevance of the Irrelevant.”* The main point of the post was that when someone introduces something into an argument or discussion that is off-topic, they are inadvertently revealing what is truly in their mind. 

That latest example of this comes to us from the state of Mississippi. The mayor of a town called Petal, Hal Marx, commenting on the death of George Floyd, contended that he “didn’t see anything unreasonable” about it. Apparently, pressing one’s knee on a man’s neck for almost nine minutes while one’s victim cries out that he can’t breathe is quite reasonable down south. Marx added that “if you can say you can’t breathe, you’re breathing.”** 

What we have here is an example of pedantry used as an attempt to segue into an irrelevant tangent. Yes, Mayor Marx is pedantically correct in that if you can speak, you’re alive and breathing. Except, of course, every English speaker understands the words “I can’t breathe” are not to be taken literally. They are a signal that something dangerous is happening. 

Why did the mayor go off on a tangent? The irrelevance tells us the truth about his mindset as proven by his subsequent words: “Most likely that man died of overdose or heart attack.” “That man,” George Floyd, a Black American, had to be a contributor to his own demise. He couldn’t just be a victim of (white) police brutality; he had to be a criminal of some sort—at the very least a druggie. 

If Hal Marx had not offered up the irrelevant pedantry, would we know him as a racist?

I wonder what Marx would say to Mr. Shakespeare, whose Hamlet says (in Act V, Scene 2) after he has been pricked by a poisoned rapier: “I am dead, Horatio.”   

***



Sunday, May 24, 2020

No Lazarus



Several decades ago, Mel Brooks appeared on William B. Williams’ radio show on WNEW New York. Brooks regaled Williams and his listeners with the story of the Resurrecting Rabbi.*

I will give a rendition of the tale—unfortunately without Brooks’ Yiddish accent and shtick.

A very wealthy Jewish man dies suddenly. His family had heard of a Resurrecting Rabbi living in Vilnius, Lithuania, and so they hire a private jet to rush said Rabbi to the Upper East Side of Manhattan. 

The Rabbi arrives at an apartment filled with people who want to behold the miracle. He goes into the bedroom where the deceased is laid out and begins to daven. “Baruch etc.etc yada yada . . . (imagine Brooks doing this). Morris Reshevsky, listen unto me. Arise ye now from this bed and join your family and friends. Baruch etc etc yada yada. Sit up now!”

Nothing.

“Too many people in the room. Only the close family.”

The friends and neighbors file out.

“Morris Reshevky! [Davens] Baruch yada yada etc etc. Hear this: ye are to arise from the bed, return to life, and have a glass tea with your loved ones. At the count of three. One. Two. Three. Arise now!” 

Nothing.

The Rabbi shrugs his shoulder. “Now that’s what I call dead.”

*

The New York Times printed a front page today with the names of 1,000 of the 100,000 American victims of the coronavirus. No Resurrecting Rabbi can bring any of them back to life. They are what you call “dead.”

*

Almost since the peril of the virus to human life became apparent, shtarkers have been volunteering others to face the dangers lurking out in the world. An early recruit to shtarkerdom (almost exactly two months ago) was the lieutenant governor of Texas,** Dan Patrick.

Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) seems to think that if given the choice, Americans 70 and over would be willing to risk getting coronavirus and possibly dying if it means stores re-open and the economy rebounds.*** 

The chorus of shtarker voices has only grown louder over the past months. “Yeah, people will die—but the economy will live!”

I’m waiting for the shtarkers to man up and say, “Me, Sarge. I’ll go first. I’m willing to die so the economy may live.” Rather, they’re like their leader, who was spurred to take to his heels during the Viet Nam war.

Oh, the economy won’t die. Even on life support, it will be fed intravenously by Treasury bailouts. 

The shtarkers can rest comfortably behind their desks. No way they’re delivering groceries or flipping hamburgers. 

They are proof of the truth of the old song: “Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.”

***
*  I may have the only tape of the tale in existence. Now, if I could only find it . . . .

**  What qualification do you need to be lieutenant governor of Texas?
  Answer: An IQ equal to that of a rock.

  What qualification do you need to be governor of Texas?
  Answer: An IQ just slightly higher than that of a rock.

Monday, May 4, 2020

Give and Take



"When someone shows you who they are believe them." 
Maya Angelou

*

"The expressiveness of the individual . . . appears to involve two radically different kinds of sign activity: the expression that he gives and the expression that he gives off."
Erving Goffman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life

*

As individuals, it is always in our interest to control the impression that others have of us. Thus, we attempt to convey to others what we want them to think of us by our dress, our speaking style and language, our gestures, and so forth. These are the signs that we give. They are choices made to establish our persona and to allow us to navigate the world in the manner we desire. 

But we are not always in control of our expressions, and thus the impression that others have of us. The ill-fitting suit, the outdated slang, the nod when there should be a wink are examples of “sign activity” that subvert the intended impression that we wished to convey.

*

No one of recent vintage has been more assiduous at giving verbal signs in an attempt to influence the perception of his persona by others than Donald Trump. He is, he has claimed to be, “very smart”—indeed, “a stable genius.” We note these statements here without bothering to pursue them further at this time. What we are interested in right now are two recent statements (verbal expressions, in other words) by Trump in which he attempted to control others’ impression of him—but which gave off contrary information that contradicted the impression he tried to give.

The first statement was Trump’s attempt to maintain the image of a Teflon don (pun not necessarily intended) in a blue Bar Mitzvah suit. Attempting to give that impression in response to criticism of the bungled response to the coronavirus pandemic, he stated, “I don't take responsibility at all.” However, Trump’s verbal sign is contradicted by the expression given off by a knowing reading of the words by his audience. Here is a man, says this contrary reading, that is not responsible—that is, irresponsible. “I don't take responsibility at all” thus equals “I am irresponsible.”

The second statement recently made by Trump in an attempt to give a favorable sign came when he was asked if he had “any interest in reaching out to presidents Bush, Clinton, Obama, Carter . . . .” Trump replied, “I don’t think I’m going to learn much.”*

This was Trump with his “very smart,” “stable genius” hat on. But what the statement gives off is the impression of someone who is either unable or unwilling to learn anything.

*

I used to make the point to my freshman classes that it would be wonderful if people carried a sign that announced what they were really like (“I am a jealous person”; “I am a generous person”; and so on). Unfortunately, that’s not the case in the real world. We can, if we dare, take people only at their self-evaluation, judging them on the signs that they deliberately give. But it is always best to scrutinize the signs given off, those unconscious expressions of selfhood that convey to us observers what trust we should or should not have in the expressions that others’ give us.

***

*  https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2020/03/2020-time-capsule-7-i-dont-think-im-going-to-learn-much/608569/








Sunday, May 3, 2020

Cut The Deck


President Trump said Thursday that he had seen evidence to prove that the coronavirus pandemic had spread from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, but he declined to detail what that evidence was.
“I’m not allowed to tell you that,” he said . . . .*

Let’s consider this for a bit. Trump says he’s “not allowed to tell” us. Well, why is he not allowed to tell? Who is stopping him? Way back early in his administration he declassified secret information; as president, he had the right to do so. Just a year ago last May, for example, he gave the Attorney General broad power to declassify documents.** He had no one above him to say no, to disallow the release of such information. 

Trump’s refusal to divulge his (apparent) evidence immediately reminded me of this scene in the W. C. Fields/Mae West film “My Little Chickadee.”





Clearly, Trump (no gentleman) was pulling a fake “Gentleman’s Game” ploy before our eyes. To quote Gertrude Stein, as far as Trump’s privileged information went, there was “no there there.” 

Trump has been pulling the fake card trick for years now. His most used fakery phrase is “many people.” A recent variant was "very good experts”—who supposedly predicted that the coronavirus outbreak "would never affect the United States.”*** 

When next he tries to pull that stunt, I am waiting for someone to pop up and demand: “Name one!”


***




***  https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-very-good-experts-said-coronavirus-would-never-affect-us-2020-4